A Growing ‘Wealth-Poverty Gap’: The Way Affluence and Deprivation Are Found Cheek by Jowl in England.
In a postwar estate known as ‘The Nunny’, inhabitants live in homes just a few metres from their more affluent neighbours in nearby Scartho village. A 1.8-metre-high barricade literally separates the two areas in Grimsby, Lincolnshire, sealing off roads and walkways that previously connected them.
“This is the posh-poor divide,” said a resident, aged 37. “It’s been like this since I’ve known. I doubt they’ll take it down because I suspect they’ll want to associate with us.”
An Increasingly Common National Picture
Analysis of government statistics reveals how deep disparity can run, at times across little more than a few metres of asphalt, a hedge row or a wall. Decades of austerity and lack of funding mean a majority of local authorities now have a neighbourhood classified as one of the most deprived in the country.
This geographical widening of poverty has led to a sharp rise in the number of places where deprived and affluent people end up living side by side. In 2019, only 65 of the most deprived areas adjoined one of the wealthiest. This number increased to 119 in the most recent data.
A Barrier Which Divides More Than Land
At this Lincolnshire site, the divide is the biggest in the UK and starkly apparent. The wall transcends being just a symbolic divide; it creates tangible difficulties for daily routines.
- School runs that should take a quarter of an hour turn into an sixty-minute detour.
- Reaching important amenities like supermarkets, schools and employment centres is hindered.
- The site can attract vandalism and loitering, with reports of litter being dumped over the wall and related problems.
“You try to maintain a nice house and nice garden, and then you live opposite that,” said one local, gesturing towards the corroded barricade.
Local Bonds Against a Backdrop of Hardship
Within Centre4, staff emphasise that need does not recognise postcodes. “Where you live is not a reliable indicator of your personal struggles,” said director a community leader.
Regardless of being placed in the lowest 10% for income, employment, education, health and crime, the estate boasts a strong sense and sense of togetherness among its residents. By contrast, Scartho is classified among the least deprived 10% overall.
Echoes Elsewhere: Stanhope in Ashford
This pattern is repeated across the country. The Stanhope estate in Kent, a 1960s overspill estate, is in the 10% most deprived of neighbourhoods in the country. It is closely bordered by spacious detached homes built in the early 2000s that are in the top 10% for employment and living environment.
“They might have larger properties, but here there’s more community,” said a long-term resident, 63. “You’ll probably find many people over there never even talk to each other.”
The economic divide is clear: an average family home costs about £275,000 on the estate, while across the divide comparable properties fetch about £410,000.
Locals speak of a tangible feeling of neglect. “This part of the community gets ignored,” stated resident Susan. “In this area our amenities have slowly been taken away, and the majority of the community problems here are related to financial hardship.”
The rise in these ‘inequality borders’ presents a portrait of an increasingly divided society, where prosperity and deprivation are often awkwardly close neighbours.